How do you build investor relationships before you're raising?

The founders who close rounds fastest are never strangers to their investors on the day they ask for money. Relationship-building before a raise turns a cold pitch into a warm conversation — and it changes the power dynamic entirely. Start 6 to 12 months before you plan to raise, treat it as a reporting discipline, and use your traction milestones as the content.

Why 'I'm not raising yet' is your most powerful opening line

When you approach an investor without asking for money, you remove the adversarial dynamic that makes most first meetings awkward. The investor isn't being pressured to decide, and you aren't performing. You're just two people talking about a market, a problem, and early signals from users. That context makes it easy to be honest about what you don't know yet — which, counterintuitively, builds more credibility than a polished pitch deck.

Paul Graham's writing on fundraising mechanics makes clear that the moment you officially start raising, you enter a compressed, high-stakes process where timing and momentum matter enormously. Everything that happens before that window — the coffee, the Zoom, the 'wanted to get your perspective' email — is what determines whether investors pick up the call when you do flip the switch.

The practical implication: identify 15 to 25 investors who have a pattern of investing in your space and at your stage. Not a mass list — a curated one where you've read what they've written, know their portfolio, and can have a genuine conversation about the intersection of their thesis and your problem. Start having those conversations now, with zero ask attached.

Use progress updates as relationship infrastructure

The most underused tool in pre-raise relationship building is the investor update — sent to people who haven't even invested yet. A short, honest monthly or quarterly email that shows your key metrics, a win, a setback, and what you're focused on next does more for trust than any meeting. It lets a prospective investor watch you make decisions over time, which is ultimately what they're betting on.

The update doesn't need to be polished. It needs to be real. Include one number that's moved, one thing that surprised you about your users, and one clear next milestone. When you eventually ask someone to invest, they've already seen you operate through three or four of these updates. They know how you think, how you handle bad news, and whether your judgment has held up against what you said you'd do. That's not something a pitch deck can manufacture.

This approach also creates a natural reason to stay in touch without being annoying. You're not following up to see if they've changed their mind — you're continuing a conversation that was never about asking in the first place. When the raise opens, you're not starting from zero with these people. You're picking up a thread.

Show, don't tell: let your early users be the proof

One of Paul Graham's core arguments in his writing on doing things that don't scale is that the feedback you get from direct, hands-on engagement with early users is irreplaceable. That same principle applies to investor relationships: the most persuasive thing you can bring to a pre-raise conversation isn't a forecast — it's a real user story told with specificity.

When you can sit down with an investor 6 months before your round and say 'we have 40 users, here's what we've learned from spending time with each of them, here's the one thing we got totally wrong, and here's what the best of them are doing with the product' — that's more convincing than a deck with a TAM slide. It shows you're actually in the market, not theorizing about it. Investors who've heard that story firsthand will recall it when you come back with a formal raise.

If you're so early that you don't have users yet, the substitute is sharp thinking about the problem. What do you know about this space that most people don't? What have you observed that led you to this specific approach? Intellectual honesty about uncertainty, paired with real evidence of curiosity and rigor, is what separates founders worth watching from founders worth passing on.

Warm intros and the structure of investor networks

Cold outreach to investors has a low ceiling. Not because investors are inaccessible, but because the signal-to-noise ratio in their inboxes is brutal. A warm introduction from a founder they've backed, an operator they respect, or a co-investor they trust cuts through that noise instantly. So part of your pre-raise relationship building is actually building relationships with the people who can introduce you to the investors you want to meet.

This means investing in founder community early. Help other founders in your space — make introductions, share what's working, give honest feedback when asked. The startup world is small enough that this reciprocity compounds quickly. When you ask a well-connected founder to introduce you to a specific partner, they'll do it enthusiastically if you've already shown up as someone worth vouching for.

Map the specific investors you're targeting and trace the shortest warm path to each one. LinkedIn is useful for this, but founder Slack groups, alumni networks, and accelerator communities often surface better connective tissue. For each investor on your list, find one person who knows them well enough to give you a genuine endorsement — not just 'I can CC you on an email' but 'I told them to make time for you.'

The mechanics of entering a raise with momentum already built

Paul Graham's fundraising advice emphasizes how much momentum matters once you officially open a round — and one reason some founders build momentum faster than others is that they've already done the relationship work. When you kick off a raise having sent six months of updates to a set of interested investors, having met most of them in low-pressure settings, and having at least two or three who've said 'come back to us when you're raising' — you're not starting cold. You have a list of people to call on day one.

This matters because of how fundraising dynamics actually work. The first few commitments create credibility that makes the next commitments easier. If you open a round and can quickly get to a meaningful percentage closed, the investors still deciding see a signal that others have already decided favorably. The alternative — opening a round with no warm relationships and trying to build them while simultaneously closing — is genuinely hard. You're doing two things at once under time pressure, and neither gets done as well.

The goal of all this pre-raise work isn't to manipulate the process. It's to make sure that when you do ask, the people you're asking have enough genuine context about you and your company to make a real decision quickly. That's better for everyone.

“Fundraising is hard like lifting a weight, and hard like solving a puzzle.”

— Paul Graham, source

The one thing to do

Pick 20 investors who match your stage and thesis, start sending them honest quarterly updates six months before you need money, and ask for introductions — not checks — until your metrics are ready.

Frequently asked questions

How early should you start building investor relationships?

Six to twelve months before you plan to open a round is the practical minimum. Earlier is fine if you're having genuine conversations — not pitching, just learning and staying visible with a small curated list of investors who match your stage and sector.

Should you send investor updates to people who haven't invested yet?

Yes, with their permission. Ask if they'd like to stay in the loop as you build. Most investors who've expressed interest will say yes, and regular honest updates let them watch your execution over time — which is far more persuasive than a single pitch.

What if you don't have traction yet — what do you talk to investors about?

Talk about what you're learning. Share what surprised you about the problem, what customers have told you, and how your thinking has evolved. Investors bet on founders first. Demonstrating honest, rigorous thinking about a real problem is valuable signal even before the metrics exist.

How many investors should you be building relationships with pre-raise?

Fifteen to twenty-five is a practical range for most early-stage founders — enough to have multiple warm relationships when the round opens, not so many that you can't give each conversation real attention and follow-through.

Sources

More playbook answers · Growth Prophet home