How do you give equity to early employees?

Early employee equity is one of the most consequential decisions you'll make as a founder — get it wrong and you'll either lose the people who built your company or create cap table problems that haunt you at every future financing round. The core framework is straightforward: grant meaningful equity with four-year vesting and a one-year cliff, calibrate the percentage to the stage and role, and put everything in writing before anyone starts work.

Why early employee equity is different from founder equity

Founders divide the company at the start, before there's evidence of any value. Early employees arrive later — often before product-market fit, but after the hardest blank-page moment. Their equity is compensation for taking a below-market salary and genuine career risk in exchange for upside that may never materialize. This distinction matters because it determines both the size of the grant and the legal structure you use.

Founders typically hold restricted stock, which is purchased at near-zero cost when the company has near-zero value. Early employees, by contrast, almost always receive stock options — specifically incentive stock options (ISOs) if they're US employees — because the IRS treats options more favorably for employees joining after incorporation. The strike price of those options is set at the current 409A fair market value, which is why getting a 409A valuation done before you start making grants protects both the company and the employee. An option with a strike price set too low relative to actual value creates a tax liability for the employee; one set at fair market value does not.

The practical upshot: don't delay formalizing equity agreements. Every week you wait, the company's fair market value may be rising, which means the options you eventually issue will be less valuable in real terms. More importantly, vesting clocks don't start until a grant is formally approved by the board.

How much equity to actually grant

There's no universal right answer, but there are defensible ranges. At the pre-seed or seed stage, the first few employees — often called 'employee zero' or 'employee one' — typically receive somewhere between 0.5% and 2% of the fully-diluted cap table, depending on their seniority and how much of a salary cut they're taking. As the company raises more money and de-risks, subsequent employees receive less: by Series A, senior engineering or product hires might see 0.1% to 0.5%, and later hires less still.

A practical way to think about grant size: what is this person's market salary, and how much are they discounting it to work here? The equity should, over a multi-year horizon, compensate for that gap if things go well. If you're paying someone $80,000 who could earn $160,000 elsewhere, the equity grant should have a plausible expected value that more than covers the $80,000 annual difference over the vesting period — accounting for the high probability that the startup returns nothing.

One mistake founders make is treating equity as a fixed budget to ration rather than a tool to attract the right people. If someone exceptional wants to join but your instinct is to lowball the grant to 'save' equity, you're optimizing for the wrong thing. A great early employee who dramatically increases the company's trajectory is worth far more dilution than a mediocre one who accepts a stingy offer. Another mistake is failing to reserve enough in an option pool before fundraising — investors will typically require a pool refresh anyway, so better to create enough headroom upfront.

Vesting schedules and why the cliff matters

The standard vesting schedule in the US startup world is four years with a one-year cliff. This means nothing vests for the first twelve months, then 25% vests all at once on the one-year anniversary, and the remaining 75% vests monthly over the following three years. This structure exists for a specific reason: it protects the company from someone joining, vesting immediately, and leaving before contributing meaningfully, while still giving the employee a concrete date by which they'll have something real.

The cliff is not just a legal technicality — it's a trust mechanism. It signals to the employee that you expect the relationship to be long-term, and it signals to the company that the employee is committed. If someone leaves before their cliff, they walk away with nothing, which can feel harsh, but it also means the company isn't carrying dead equity on the cap table held by someone no longer contributing.

Some founders add acceleration clauses — provisions that vest some or all unvested equity upon a triggering event, typically an acquisition. Double-trigger acceleration (which requires both a change of control and termination of the employee) is far more common than single-trigger, and acquirers strongly prefer it. If you grant single-trigger acceleration broadly, expect friction in any future M&A process. Think carefully before including acceleration at all for individual contributors; it's more defensible for co-founder-level early hires.

The process: paperwork, conversations, and common mistakes

Every equity grant must be approved by the board and documented in a formal stock option agreement. Using a tool like Carta, Pulley, or even a well-structured cap table spreadsheet ensures you don't lose track of grants. Verbal promises of equity that were never formally documented are a startup graveyard — they create both legal exposure and deeply damaged relationships when the discrepancy is discovered at a financing round or acquisition.

Have the equity conversation explicitly before someone starts, not after. Spell out: the number of shares (not just the percentage, since percentages change with dilution), the current total shares outstanding so they can calculate the percentage themselves, the strike price, the vesting schedule, and the post-termination exercise window. The exercise window — how long after leaving the company an employee has to exercise their options — is one of the most overlooked terms. The standard is 90 days, which creates a real problem for employees who can't afford the strike price plus tax burden on departure. Some founder-friendly companies have extended this to two or five years, or even ten years, which is a meaningful benefit worth advertising.

Finally, encourage your early employees to talk to a tax advisor before they join, especially if they want to file an 83(b) election on early-exercised options. The 83(b) election, filed within 30 days of grant, can dramatically reduce their future tax liability if the company does well. Missing that window is irreversible, and it's a mistake no one in the room will catch unless someone explicitly raises it.

Equity as a signal, not just a number

The way you handle early employee equity tells people exactly how you think about fairness, transparency, and long-term partnership. Founders who are cagey about the total share count, who offer equity without explaining what it means, or who make promises they later walk back, create exactly the culture problems that destroy startups from the inside.

Being transparent about the cap table — at least enough for employees to understand what their stake means — is a sign of respect. It also attracts the kind of people who do their homework: candidates who ask intelligent questions about dilution, liquidation preferences, and option pool size are the ones who understand what they're signing up for and are more likely to stay for the right reasons.

Think of the equity conversation as an extension of what Paul Graham's writing on early-stage companies implies about doing things the right way even when no one is forcing you to: the habits you build in the first hires compound. If you're sloppy or opaque about equity with employee one, you'll be sloppy and opaque at employee fifty. The mechanical details — 409A valuations, board approvals, option agreements, exercise windows — feel like administrative overhead, but they're actually the foundation of every employment relationship that follows.

“You want to be able to say that everyone who invested early took a big risk.”

— Paul Graham, source

The one thing to do

Before your next hire starts, get a 409A valuation done, have the board formally approve the option grant, and send them a written agreement that spells out share count, strike price, vesting schedule, and exercise window — all before day one.

Frequently asked questions

What is a typical equity grant for the first non-founder employee?

At the pre-seed or seed stage, the first employee often receives 0.5% to 2% of fully diluted shares, depending on seniority, salary discount, and how early they join. Grants shrink significantly after each funding round as risk decreases.

Do early employees get stock or options?

Almost always options, specifically incentive stock options (ISOs) for US-based employees. Founders get restricted stock purchased at near-zero value at incorporation; employees who join later receive options struck at the 409A fair market value at the time of grant.

What happens to an employee's unvested options if they leave before the cliff?

With a standard one-year cliff, an employee who leaves before the twelve-month mark receives nothing — all unvested options are forfeited and returned to the option pool. After the cliff, only the already-vested portion is theirs to keep.

Should you tell employees the total share count so they can calculate their percentage?

Yes. Sharing only the number of options without the total fully diluted shares outstanding is opaque and often breeds distrust. Employees should be able to calculate their ownership percentage and understand how future dilution rounds will affect it.

Sources

More playbook answers · Growth Prophet home