How do you write positioning that customers understand?

Good positioning fails not because it's wrong but because it's written in the founder's language instead of the customer's. The fix is to start from what your buyer already believes, then connect your product to that — not the other way around. Do that and comprehension happens instantly, without explanation.

The root cause: you're writing for yourself, not for a human brain

Most positioning documents are really internal strategy memos dressed up in customer-facing clothes. They explain what the product does architecturally, what differentiates it from competitors the founder has spent months studying, and why the pricing model makes sense — none of which the buyer cares about in the first five seconds. The result is copy that is technically accurate and completely unpersuasive.

Paul Graham's observation about programming language design applies just as sharply to positioning: the best design isn't the most elegant abstraction, it's the one that accommodates the actual weaknesses and habits of the human who has to use it. Your positioning is an interface. If the person on the other end has to work hard to decode it, the interface has failed — regardless of how clever the underlying idea is.

The practical implication is that your first draft should go in the trash. That draft is for you. The second draft starts with your customer's current mental model — the words they use when they describe the problem to a colleague, the frame they already have for the category — and then places your product inside that model rather than asking them to adopt a new one.

Use the customer's vocabulary, not the category's

There is a difference between the language your industry uses and the language your customer uses. Founders absorb category language fast — ARR, conversion rate, churn, ICP — and then unconsciously project it onto buyers who have never thought in those terms. A CFO buying your finance tool doesn't think 'reduce churn'; she thinks 'stop losing clients we've already onboarded.' Same concept, completely different emotional texture.

The fastest way to close this gap is to record customer discovery calls and transcribe them verbatim. Don't summarize. Look for the exact phrases people use when they describe the problem unprompted — before you've said anything about your product. Those phrases are your positioning raw material. If three different customers say 'I spend half my Monday fixing last week's numbers,' that sentence belongs in your headline, not your internal wiki.

Winston Churchill's principle — quoted by Paul Graham — is worth posting above your monitor when you're writing: "Short words are best and the old words when short are best of all." Every time you reach for a term like 'holistic,' 'streamlined,' or 'next-generation,' ask yourself what a person would actually say out loud to a friend. Use that instead.

Answer the question they're actually asking

Every buyer landing on your positioning arrives with one implicit question, and it's almost never the question you think it is. It's not 'what does this product do?' — it's 'is this for someone like me, and will it fix the specific thing that's annoying me right now?' Your positioning has to answer that question before it answers anything else.

This means your positioning needs to name the customer's situation with enough specificity that the right person feels recognized and the wrong person self-selects out. Vague positioning ('the platform for growing teams') tries to include everyone and ends up speaking to no one. Specific positioning ('inventory tracking for Shopify stores doing over 500 orders a month') loses some people immediately — and that's correct behavior. The people it loses weren't going to buy anyway. The people it keeps read on because they feel seen.

The test is simple: read your positioning to someone who has never heard of your company and ask them to explain back to you what you do, who it's for, and why they'd switch from what they're using now. If their answer matches yours, the positioning is working. If they hedge or generalize, you haven't been specific enough about the customer's situation.

Cut the setup and put the value first

Founders tend to write positioning the way they discovered the insight: background first, problem second, solution third, value last. This is the exact wrong order for a buyer. Buyers are skimming. They will not wait for the payoff. You have to put the payoff in the headline and work backward from there.

A useful forcing function: write your positioning as if the reader already knows the problem exists and has already decided to solve it. Skip the education. Go straight to 'here's what changes for you when you use this.' That constraint reveals how much of your current copy is preamble that you included for your own comfort, not for the customer's benefit.

This also means your positioning should create a specific, concrete picture of the outcome — not a list of features and not a vague promise of improvement. 'Your sales team closes the first call with pricing that's already been approved' is a picture. 'AI-powered quoting software with real-time approval workflows' is a feature list. The picture wins because the human brain simulates experience before it processes abstractions. Give buyers something to simulate.

Test it against someone who doesn't know what you know

The curse of knowledge is the main enemy of good positioning. Once you understand your product deeply, it becomes nearly impossible to remember what it felt like not to understand it. You read your own copy and it makes sense because you're filling in gaps automatically. Your buyer can't do that.

The fix is systematic external testing with people who have no prior context. Not advisors who know your space. Not investors who've heard the pitch. Find someone who matches your customer profile but has never encountered your company, show them the positioning for ten seconds, take it away, and ask them to describe what they saw. The gaps between what you intended and what they received are your editing agenda.

Run this test every time you significantly revise. Positioning drift is real — as you learn more about your product and your market, your copy tends to creep back toward insider language. The ten-second comprehension test is the cheapest quality control process you have, and most founders skip it entirely.

“Short words are best and the old words when short are best of all.”

— Winston Churchill, quoted by Paul Graham, source

The one thing to do

Record your next three customer calls, pull the exact phrases buyers use unprompted, and rewrite your headline using their words instead of yours — then test it with a ten-second comprehension check on someone outside your industry.

Frequently asked questions

How long should positioning copy be?

Short enough that a buyer can read it in under ten seconds and say back to you what you do and who it's for. If it takes a paragraph to establish context before you get to the value, cut the context — or make the value the opener.

Should positioning explain how the product works?

Not in the headline or primary statement. How it works is relevant only after the buyer believes it does something they care about. Lead with the outcome, use mechanism as supporting evidence later.

What's the difference between positioning and a tagline?

Positioning is the full mental model you want the customer to hold — who it's for, what problem it solves, why it's the right choice. A tagline is a compressed signal that activates that model. Get the positioning right first; the tagline follows from it.

How do you know when positioning is working?

When customers explain your product back to you using the words you chose, and when inbound leads are already pre-qualified because your copy did the filtering. Both signs take a few weeks to observe, so test early and iterate before spending on distribution.

Sources

More playbook answers · Growth Prophet home